Saturday, May 23, 2020

Can a National Sales Tax Replace Income Taxes in the U.S.

Tax time is never a pleasant experience for any American. Collectively, millions and millions of hours are spent filling out forms and trying to decipher arcane instructions and tax regulations. By filling out these forms and perhaps even sending an additional check to the Internal Revenue Service (IRS), we become painfully aware of how much money we actually put into federal coffers each year. This heightened awareness generally causes a flood of proposals on how to improve the way governments collect funds. The Fair Tax Act of 2003 was one such proposal. The Fair Tax Act of 2003 Back in 2003, a group known as Americans for Fair Taxation proposed replacing the United States income tax system with a national sales tax. Representative John Linder of Georgia even went as far as to sponsor a bill known as the the Fair Tax Act of 2003, which ended with fifty-four other co-sponsors.  The acts stated aim was to: â€Å"To promote freedom, fairness and economic opportunity by repealing the income tax and other taxes, abolishing the Internal Revenue Service, and enacting a national sales tax to be administered primarily by the states. A fellow About.com expert, Robert Longley, wrote an interesting summary of the Fair Tax proposal  that is worth checking out. Though the Fair Tax Act of 2003 ultimately did not pass, the questions raised by its presentation and the underlying concepts of the move from an income tax to a national sales tax still remain a highly discussed topic in the economic and political arenas. Proposal for a National Sales Tax The core idea of the Fair Tax Act of 2003, the idea to replace the income tax with a sales tax, is not a new one. Federal sales taxes are widely used in other countries around the world, and given the low tax burden compared to Canada and Europe, it is at least plausible that the federal government could obtain enough revenue from a sales tax in order to completely replace federal income taxes. The Fair Tax movement represented by the 2003 act proposed a scheme in which the Internal Revenue Code would be amended to repeal subtitle A, subtitle B, and subtitle C, or income, estate and gift, and employment taxes respectively. The proposal called for these three areas of the tax code to be revoked in favor of  a 23% national sales tax. It is not difficult to see the appeal of such a system. Since all taxes would be collected by businesses, there would be no need for private citizens to fill out tax forms. We could abolish the IRS! And most states already collect sales taxes, so a federal sales tax could be collected by the states, thus reducing administrative costs. There are a lot of apparent benefits to such a change. But in order to properly analyze such a large change to the American tax system, there are three questions we must ask : What impact will the change have on consumer spending and the economy?Who wins and who loses under a national sales tax?Is such a scheme even feasible? We will examine each question over the next four sections. One of the largest effects a move  to a national sales tax system would have is to change peoples working and  consumption behavior. People respond to incentives, and tax policies change the incentives people have to work and to consume. It is unclear if replacing an income tax with a sales tax would cause consumption within the United States to rise or fall. There will be two primary and opposing forces at play: 1. The Effect on Income Because income would no longer be taxed under a national sales tax system like FairTax, the incentives to work would change. One consideration would be the impact on a workers approach to overtime hours. Many workers can choose the amount of overtime they work. Take, for example, someone who would make an extra $25 if he worked an hour of overtime. If his marginal income tax rate for that extra hour of work is 40% under our current income tax code, he would only take home $15 out of the $25 as $10 would go toward his income taxes. If income taxes are eliminated, he would get to keep the whole $25. If an hour of free time is worth $20, then he would work the extra hour under the sales tax plan, but not work it under the income tax plan. So a change to a national sales tax plan reduces the disincentives to work, and workers as a whole would likely end up working and earning more. Many economists argue that when workers earn more, theyll also spend more. So the effect on income suggests that the FairTax plan could cause consumption to increase. 2. Changes in Spending Patterns It goes without saying that people dont like paying taxes if they dont have to. If there is a large sales tax on purchasing goods, we should expect people to spend less money on those goods. This could be accomplished in several ways: Spending less and saving more. Of course, todays savings are likely to be used for tomorrows consumption, so consumers may just be delaying the inevitable. But workers may still wish to save more now as opposed to spend, as they may believe the sales tax will not last forever or they may plan on finding other ways to avoid the tax in the future.Spending money outside of the United States. Currently if consumers wish to spend their money cross-border shopping in Canada or on a vacation in the Caribbean, they have already been taxed by the Federal government on that money at the income level. Under a sales tax scheme, they can spend their earnings outside the country and not be taxed on any of it, unless they bring enough goods back into the United States. So we should expect to see more money spent on vacations and outside of the United States, and less money spent domestically within the United States.Spending in a manner that evades taxes. If there is an easy way to evade taxes, it is highly likely that a large number of people will exploit it. One way to evade a national sales tax would be to claim your spending as a business expense, even if it is a purchase for personal use. Goods which are used in production, known as intermediate goods, are generally not subject to a regular sales tax. The government could close this loophole by making the sales tax a Value Added Tax (VAT) like the Canadian Goods and Services Tax (GST). But VATs and GSTs are rather unpopular with the business community, as they raise the costs of production, so it is unlikely the U.S. would want to embark on this path. With a high sales tax rate, tax evasion will be prevalent, so this effect will cause a decrease in spending on taxed goods. Overall, it is not clear whether consumer spending would increase or decrease. But there are still conclusions we can draw on what effect this will have on different parts of the economy. We saw in the previous section that a simple analysis cannot help us determine what would happen to consumer spending were a national sales tax system like the one proposed by the FairTax movement be implemented in the United States. From that analysis, however, we can see that a change to a national sales tax is likely to influence the following macroeconomic variables: Production would likely rise as marginal income tax rates fall to zero, which induces people to work extra hours.Take home income would rise as people are not taxed on income and presumably may work extra hours.Consumer spending within the United States may or may not rise.Saving and spending abroad would likely increase, which would cause:A weakening of the U.S. dollar as Americans who want to buy foreign goods will need to exchange their U.S. dollars for foreign currency. We should expect to see the U.S. dollar become less valuable relative to other currencies, particularly the Canadian dollar.The price of investment goods such as bonds may rise as people wish to save more, so interest rates would fall.The after-tax price of consumer goods would go up due to the new sales tax. The pre-tax price of consumer goods, on the other hand, would be more likely to fall since increased productivity would cause an increase in the supply of goods. We have seen that we cannot be sure whether or not there would be an increase or decrease in demand for consumer goods purchased within the United States. The price of these consumer goods would increase, but not by the full amount caused by the tax increase.The price of goods outside of the United States (particularly in Canada) would likely increase because of this increased demand. Cities such as Windsor, Ontario should expect to see even more American visitors than they do already. It is important to note, however, that not all consumers would be affected equally by these changes. Well next look at who will lose and who will win under a national sales tax. Changes in government policy never affects everybody equally and not all consumers would be affected equally by these changes. Lets take a look at who would win under a national sales tax system and who would lose. Americans for Fair Taxation estimates that the typical American family will be over 10% better off than they currently are under the income tax system. But even if you were to share the same sentiment as Americans for Fair Taxation, it is clear that all individuals and American households are typical, so some would benefit more than others and, of course, some would benefit less. Who Might Lose Under a National Sales Tax? Seniors. People do not earn income at a steady rate during their lifetime. The bulk of most peoples earnings occurs before the age of 65. People over the age of 65 have vastly reduced incomes and typically live off the savings they earned while employed in addition to programs like Social Security. A switch to a national sales tax would, in effect, result in taxing much of that money twice. These individuals would have already paid a lifetime of income taxes and would now be living off of a mix of previously taxed and tax-deferred savings. Under a new national sales tax system, the previously taxed savings would essentially be subject to tax again when used for purchases. Unless special consideration is given to the current generation of seniors, they would end up paying a disproportionate share of taxes. The Poor. Generally under the current system, the working poor pay very little (if any) income tax. But everyone needs to consume to survive. The poor would get hit twice under suc h a scheme. While currently the poor pay very little tax, under the new system they would have to pay taxes on their consumption, so their total tax bill would rise dramatically. The poor also spend a larger proportion of their total income on consumption goods to survive, so they would ultimately pay a larger percentage of their income in taxes than wealthier individuals. The FairTax advocates realize this, so their plan includes sending each American family a rebate or pre-bate check each month to cover the necessities of life. The size of the checks would be designed such that a family right at the poverty line would not pay a cent in taxes. Of course, the higher the allowance made for the poor, the higher the tax rate everyone else will pay in order to cover federal spending.Economist William G. Gale at the Brookings Institute has determined that most low income families would still pay more taxes under a national sales tax system, stating, Under the Americans for Fair Taxation proposal, taxes would rise for households in the bottom 90 percent of the income distribution, while households in the top 1 percent would receive an average tax cut of over $75,000. Families.  The current American income tax offers all sorts of deductions for small families such as earned income credits and child care credits. Under a national sales tax system, these would disappear with the elimination of the income tax. A sales tax, other than for purposes of the rebate, would not distinguish between families and individuals. Gale states that the enactment of a broad-based, flat-rate consumption tax like the sales tax ... would hurt families with incomes less than $200,000, because of the loss of tax preferences, but would help families with income above $200,000, due to the dramatic reduction in the top tax rate. Given that the rebates in the current proposal would be given based on proximity to the poverty line, this is not surprising. IRS Employees and Income Tax Lawyers. Pa rt of the appeal of the proposal is that it will make the IRS irrelevant, which would eliminate the need for jobs in these industries, while likely not creating enough or any new opportunities for these displaced workers. Having looked at those groups who would likely lose under a national sales tax system such as the one proposed by the FairTax movement, we will now examine those who would benefit most. Who Might Win Under a National Sales Tax? People who are inclined to save. A consumption tax can be avoided by not consuming. So it makes sense that people who do not consume a lot will benefit from the plan. Gale admits that there are savings for a large portion of the population, stating that if households are classified by consumption level, a somewhat different pattern emerges. Households in the bottom two-thirds of the distribution would pay less than [they do] currently, [while] households in the top third would pay more. Still households at the very top would pay much less, again receiving a tax cut of about $75,000.People who can shop in other countries.  This group includes people who take a lot of  overseas vacations and Americans living near either the Canadian or Mexican border who can do their shopping in those countries to avoid American sales taxes.People who own businesses.  The sales tax will only be charged on goods bought by individuals, not by firms. Owning a business would give an individual an adv antage as goods could be purchased free of sales tax if they are claimed as business expenses.The wealthiest one percent.  As stated previously, this group would likely see an average tax cut of $75,000 per person. National Sales Tax Conclusions Like the flat tax proposal before it, FairTax was an interesting proposal to solve the issues of an overly complex system. While implementation of a FairTax system would have several positive (and a few negative) consequences for the economy, groups that lose under the system would certainly make their opposition known and those concerns would need to be addressed explicitly. Despite the fact that the 2003 act did not pass in Congress, the underlying concept remains an interesting idea worth discussing.

Monday, May 11, 2020

Intel Case Study Of Intel - 1280 Words

Intel Case Study In the case study of Intel, as noted by Palmer, Dunford, Akin, C. R. Barrett, Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of Intel was half-way through a six-year tenure. As CEO, Barrett implemented a number of changes to the organization and experienced many unforeseen environmental pressures. Barrett wanted to make a lasting impact upon the organization, as his/her processors had done, and worked hard to keep the company competitive and profitable during a time when technology companies were significantly struggling or outright failing. According to Dedrick, Gurbaxani, Kraemer, in the mid-2000, IT investment decreased due to sluggish financial growth, and the collapse of many Internet-related companies (2003). Barrett managed to†¦show more content†¦Too much organizational change, as displayed by Barrett, can create an environment of uncertainty and damage the likelihood for success. As noted by Palmer, et al., the implementation of a new culture can lead to conflict...and can be an i nfluence in failure or success (2009). Environmental Pressures In addition to the various changes Intel went through, there were also many environmental pressures such as fashion, geopolitical, market decline, hypercompetition, and reputation and credibility pressures placed upon the company. As noted above, the change in organizational culture and restructure can be considered fashion pressures, and the weak demand in the semiconductor industry can be associated with pressure of a market decline. Also, Intel had to deal with a number of geopolitical pressures such as the tragedy of September 11, 2001 and the resulting threat of war, as well as a sluggish national economy (Palmer, et al., 2009). Intel adapted by realigning its resources in an effort to capitalize the strength of its workforce in an effort to remain competitive. Also, Intel faced hypercompetitive pressures from its competitors and could no longer simply rely upon their top-tiered marketplace standing for its company success. They would have to respond to their competition with innovative products, which at times, bled into other markets andShow MoreRelatedIntel (Case Study)1409 Words   |  6 Pagesthe Value Network †¢ Value Proposition V- Recommendations. Intel Corporation 1. Introduction Intel, the world leader in silicon innovation, develops technologies, products, and initiatives to continually advance how people work and live. Founded in 1968 to build semiconductor memory products, Intel introduced the worlds first microprocessor in 1971. 2. Current Situation Mission Statement Intel’s mission is to delightRead MoreIntel Case Study Essays625 Words   |  3 PagesCase Study Intel’s â€Å"rebates† and Other Ways It â€Å"Helped† Customers In your judgment is Intel a â€Å"monopoly†? Did Intel use monopoly-like power, in other words, did Intel achieve its objectives by relying on power that it had due to its control of a large portion of the market? Explain your answers. In my judgment Intel did react like a monopoly. Pure monopoly exists when a single firm is the sole producer of a product for which there are no close substitutes. The characteristics of a monopolyRead MoreIntel Case Study956 Words   |  4 PagesIntel Case DRAM industry analysis - lessons learned By the early 1980, Intel’s total share in DRAM was barely 1% and manufacturing was restricted to one fab out of Intel’s eight fab, where the Japanese semiconductor companies had captured nearly half of the world memory market. There are several factors that forced Intel to exit the DRAM market, those are the same lessons learned. 1. Intel was always the pioneer in inventing and enhancing the DRAM with respect to the price and performance,Read MoreIntel Case Study Essay3886 Words   |  16 PagesBusiness and Entrepreneurship Technology and Innovation Management Case Study of Intel Corporation Team Members Prasanna Pavuluri Fergus Hanley Mazin Daghistani Student ID D14124072 C09491082 D14124910 Date of Submission: 26 November 2014 1 Table of Contents (1)Introduction ........................................................................................................................................ 3 (1.1) History of Intel ..............................................................Read MoreCase Study: Amd vs. Intel1549 Words   |  7 PagesCASE STUDY 1 AMD vs. INTEL Group 4 Fariba Ma’soomeh Hadi Ahmad Salman 21. Mar. 2010 DBA / MMU AMD vs. INTEL Competitive Challenges The competitive challenges between the top two-chip maker Intel and AMD took a new dimension due to different strategic initiatives taken by both the companies. It is obviously clear that in a condition like competition between these two giants the strategies taken by each can emphasize on the other side of market as it influence the success of theRead MoreChipping Away at Intel Case Study1086 Words   |  5 PagesChipping Away at Intel Case Study In today’s economy, corporations are consistently experiencing pressures to change. With pressures both internally and externally, leaders must constantly reassess who, what, when, where, why and how they do business. In light of these obstacles, they strive for the highest possibility of success by taking risks and pushing limits that others may question as extreme. We are going to review the â€Å"Chipping Away at Intel Case Study† to examine the different changesRead MoreIntel Case Study 1992 Essay1301 Words   |  6 PagesIntel Corporation, 1992 Case Study Describe the characteristics of the industry in which Intel operates. How is Intel positioned in the industry? Intel operates in an industry, which is comprised of products involving high research and development costs, continuous product improvement and new innovations. The companies in the industry are having high economies of scale and are knowledge based. It helps both the service and manufacturing sectors in the growth process. Intel is positionedRead MoreIntel Pentium Case Study952 Words   |  4 PagesGrove, President amp; CEO, Intel Inc. From: FT56212/0 Subject: The Intel Pentium Chip Controversy Intel, the most popular micro-processing chip manufacturer in the early nineties had introduced the Pentium processor to improve speed of computer operations. The Pentium was the result of constant innovation and expensive research and development and yet was accused as being defective in solving particular mathematical calculations. The primary question facing Intel was whether or not to recallRead MoreIntel in China Case Study Essay833 Words   |  4 PagesThe Intel in China case presents a valid issue. But deep beneath the surface, this case has many other issues associated with the one presented. At the surface it is evident that Li is an emotional worker who puts his whole hearted effort into his job. This presents a challenge for any manager because of the emotional attachment that the employee presents. But the question is whether it is just Li that feels this way in the organization. Perhaps, this behavior stems from other organizational issuesRead MoreCase Study - Intel This is a strategic management case3101 Words   |  13 PagesKEY DRIVERS What drove Intel? Craig Barrett, appointed executive vice president in January 1990, believes that the world changes and the centre of gravity shifts. We need to shift with it. . Intel recognises the need for continually analysing and reviewing its strategies in order to meet the changes and challenges that come from the external environments so as to meet the stakeholders expectations. Intel strives for business renewal and revitalisation as a way of dealing effectively with the

Wednesday, May 6, 2020

Compare Human Brain and the Computer Free Essays

Over the past years we have seen how computers are becoming more and more advance, challenging the abilities of the human brain. We have seen computers doing complex assignments like launching of a rocket or analysis from outer space. But the human brain is responsible for, thought, feelings, creativity, and other qualities that make us humans. We will write a custom essay sample on Compare Human Brain and the Computer or any similar topic only for you Order Now So the brain has to be more complex and more complete than any computer. Besides if the brain created the computer, the computer cannot be better than the brain. There are many differences between the human brain and the computer, for example, the capacity to learn new things. Even the most advance computer can never learn like a human does. While we might be able to install new information onto a computer it can never learn new material by itself. Also computers are limited to what they â€Å"learn†, depending on the memory left or space in the hard disk not like the human brain which is constantly learning everyday. Computers can neither make judgments on what they are â€Å"learning† or disagree with the new material. They must accept into their memory what it’s being programmed onto them. Besides everything that is found in a computer is based on what the human brain has acquired though experience. Another difference between the human brain and the computer is, the creativity of the human brain. For instance humans can create art, act in plays, or write stories and songs but computers can only help us in these activities not come up with them. While computers can help us solve math problems and find answers to certain questions it can never think of new solutions until they have been programmed into them. Furthermore computers cannot create new games or produce anything they desire like humans. In fact, the human brain is the one who comes up with new ideas or theories not taught before. But in a computer, everything that is there has being taught out by the human brain. Although the computer brain and the human brain have many differences they also have a couple similarities. Both can increase their memory storage capacity. Computer memory grows by adding computer chips. Memories in the brain grow by stronger synaptic connections. Both computers and brain have repair and â€Å"backup† systems. The brain has â€Å"built-in back up systems† in some cases. If one pathway in the brain is damaged, there is often another pathway that will take over this function of the damaged pathway. Both can degrade. Computers break down and brain cells deteriorate. Like all machinery, computers break down with time. Brains also deteriorate with age, losing their functions and slowing down because of lower counts of chemicals and hormones. Both are used for storage of information, to process information and to run tasks. In terms of the functions, both are used for mathematical calculations, carrying out complex algorithms and to storing of crucial information. Counting all the similarities and differences of the brain and the computer brain, you would now see that the computer and the brain do have somethings in common, but in many more ways they are actually more different than they are similar. How to cite Compare Human Brain and the Computer, Essay examples

Friday, May 1, 2020

Redhat Cluster Suite free essay sample

RedHat Cluster Suite For creation of GFS file system . # ccs_tool create testcluster # System-config-cluster First we need to add nodes as given below . [pic] We need to add the fencing device for the as given below . [pic] Save the setup [pic] Move the configuration to the other node . # scp /etc/cluster/cluster. conf 192. 168. 1. 5:/etc/cluster/cluster. conf /etc/cluster/cluster. conf cluster conf file looks like this . [[emailprotected] ~]# cat /etc/cluster/cluster. conf [[emailprotected] ~]# Execute # CCS_tool lsnode For seeing the number nodes . [pic] # ccs_tool lsfence [pic] You are ready to proceed with starting up the following daemons on all the nodes in the cluster, once you either copied over the configs or re ran the same commands above on the other 2 nodes /etc/init. d/cman start /etc/init. d/rgmanager start You can now check the status of your cluster by running the commands below clustat cman_tool status Before we start to create the LVM2 volumes and Proceed to GFS2, we will need to enable clustering in LVM2. We will write a custom essay sample on Redhat Cluster Suite or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page lvmconf enable-cluster Now it is time to create the LVM2 Volumes pvcreate /dev/dm-6 this is show an error force them with ff option . vgcreate -c y /dev/sdb t will create clustered volume group but it will say clustered volume group isn’t supported . igmore the error . lvcreate -n testvglvm01 -L 5G testvg we need to create start the lv and start the clvmd daemon on both server . /etc/init. d/clvmd start [pic] mkfs -t -p -t ClusterName: -j # mkfs -t gfs2 -p lock_dlm -t testcluster:testpv -j 2 /dev/testvg/testvglvm01 # mount /dev/testvg/testvglvm01 /opt/testmount On both server # echo â€Å"/dev/testvg/testvglvm01 / opt/testmount gfs2 defaults,noatime,nodiratime 0 0 /etc/fstab Server Application users should have same UID which are accessing the Storage LUN.