Charlie Chaplin’s “The Kid” and Rowan Atkinson’s “Mr. Bean” Essay

The most app arnt correspondingity betwixt these two exposures is that both hits turn out righteous about the daily vitals of the primary(prenominal) characters.The main characters, Charlie and Mr. bean, in The tike and Mr. covered stadium The crowning(prenominal) hap mental picture respectively, both devote baby bird- analogous qualities, and the temperament to be rather mischievous. Mr. hit is straightforward and self-centered, abouttimes to the extent of becoming nearly mean. Despite his considerable age, he becalm sleeps cuddled up with his teddy bear. Nothing is sacral to him, and he plays his games with an earnest sheepishness. His childish heterosexualism and honesty, composition offensive at times, argon his sharpest weapons. The little adventures he outsmarts into usually revolve around the foibles of British life and the buffoonery of embarrassment. He is practically friend-less (save for his teddy bear), and is an outcast, just like Charlie, th e main character of The Kid.Charlie is a tramp living in the slumps of southbound London who, opus walking around one day, stumbles upon a crying mess up that had been abandoned on a toilet of garbage. Instead of ignoring the desperate cries of the infant or throwing it into the neargonst sewer, he displays the much condole with side of human nature by taking the baby with him and caring for it like a father. When the child is taken is forward from him, he naturally gets very upset, and with a child-like recklessness, embarks on a journey to get him backrest, a process which includes pursuing the orphans asylum van over rooftops to descend into the back of the truck, then dispatching the official who had taken the child a guidance.These two characters ar in tot upition similar in their disregard for established set and the possible consequences of their actions. Their quaintness manifests itself in the unconventional way in which they analyze and then movement to guard t he best out of any(prenominal) situation they find themselves in, clearing obstacles and resolution problems that come, their way, with a dedicate a never-say-die attitude in their attempts to in some way belong to the federation. twain hits, being mouldalistic, shine the condition of the society at the situation point of time it was made these altogether materials have been slightly distorted, with symbolism and ocular exaggeration being utilise to pose out the core messages their creators aimed to convey to the viewers, while giving the celluloids a rum effect.As Mr. Bean The Ultimate possibility film was a to a greater extent recent film The Kid was made several decades anterior to it the technology available to the creators of to each one film differed greatly. At the time of The Kids labor, a thing such as colour television was not hear of and kick the bucket had not yet been introduced into the production of films The Kid was a silent, black-and-white fil m while Mr. Bean The Ultimate calamity Movie was one with colour, sound, and real excess effects such as having its main character, Mr. Bean, falling from the sky as the impute rolled. It would be impossible to create such effects in Charlie Chaplins time. as well referable to the different eras in which these films were made, the scenario of each plot in any case differed. In the causal agent of The Kid, it was a film made in the era of the Great Depression and the effect of World War 1, and with the twin themes of delirious loss and homelessness being haunting motifs in its plot, it is a poignant well-disposed remark of the displaced refugee children of World War 1, and for the persons grieving for love ones whose lives were sacrificed in that war. The opening title, A prank with a smileand perhaps a tear, sums it up. This film addressed social and political issues of the day, and that was an admirable feat in itself considering the fact that this film did not have t he advantage of synchronized sound for converse nor colour for its images.Mr. Bean The Ultimate Disaster Movie, on the other hand, has its plot establish on a much visible light theme. It generally pokes harmless fun at the rigid and uptight stereotype we have of Englishmen by first depicting a typical Englishman, Mr. Bean himself, in a typically English environment, then subsequent puttinghim in an international environment. macrocosm release in 1997 it is a light-hearted raillery of how the more conservative English society reacts to and attempt to adapt to rapidly ever-changing international standards and the shifts in power.The main divagation of these two motion pictures is that The Kid aims to bring some cheer to its audiences hearts by cover how joy can still be found in the gloomiest conditions (as depicted in the daily lives of Charlie and the child he has adopted) and also to reflect the state of the society while Mr. Bean The Ultimate Disaster Movie seeks to bri ng some comic residuum into the highly stressful lifestyle of the modern-day individual, by actually letting them express mirth at a highly exaggerated, and therefore comic, version of themselves.As mentioned earlier, the era in which Charlie Chaplins The Kid was made did not allow for colour or sound to be incorporated into its production. Being deprived in this area, the actors in the film had to commence up for it by emphasizing on facial expressions and body movements, in line of battle to express thoughts and emotions, and also to portray authorized unique mannerisms and character traits of the various characters in the story. Modern-day audiences who are unaccustomed to this mixture of acting might feel self-conscious viewing films from the silent era, because the actors may wait to them, to be over-acting to an outrageous degree.However, it is also due to the same reason as to why silent movies tend to be more popular than modern-day drollery as overacting is a nat ural form of comedy. One example would be the involvement purview in which Charlie defends the child from the Bully. The moves desire both grace and precise comic-timing Chaplins talent was apparent in this scene as he manages to make level a brawl seem wary without the use of colour, sound or surplus effects. Title were also edited to enlighten the on-screen situation to the viewers or add critical negotiation when there was an inviolate need to.As for Mr. Bean The Ultimate Disaster Movie, dialogue is being unbroken to a minimum. The creators of this movie probably valued the focus of the viewers attention to be Mr. Beans immature, self-centered, and sometimes instantaneously mean persona and how these character traits of his actively contribute to the various sticky situations he often finds himself in. The dialogue in this film is mainly used to depict his temper or immediate response to certain occurrences, and from that, the viewers form a deeper slump of his char acter. Dialogue is seldom used to make known to the audience the plans the characters has in intellectual to tackle his problems. Mr. Bean almost ceaselessly executes his impractical ideas and solutions immediately after he is faced with the problem.This deliberate lack of dialogue somehow suggests the unwillingness to share ideas, the impulsiveness to carry out ideas without consultation, and the complete disregard for the public assistance and feelings of others that will be affected by his actions. Suitable sound effects were used to further enhance the various moods of the scenes and these sounds also give viewers a hint of the magnitude and severity of the situation Mr. Bean has once again landed himself in.Both films make use of bodily comedy extensively to bring out the comic aspects of their respective characters. The signature French-kick displayed by Charlie when he was with the child was one example. Throughout the movie The Kid, this French-kick motion of Charlies is being put to death frequently other actions of this sort are often employed to enhance the boilers suit comic aspect of the movie. In Mr. Bean The Ultimate Disaster Movie, the use of physical comedy was also evident throughout the entire show, with Mr. Bean trying to split his perpetually unceasing string of problems with a clumsy and impractical style of doing so, a style that is typically his.The characters in The Kid had to endure poverty, homelessness, and extreme loneliness they are exposed to the harsher aspect of life. Mr. Bean, however, had a work and a decent place to live in the only unhappy moments he ever experiences are when his plans backfire. These moments of unhappiness are very short-lived. Therefore the characters in Chaplins film definitely possessed more emotional depth than those in rowan tree Atkinsons movie.Bibliography*http//www.dvdreview.com/fullreviews/bean.shtml*http//www.american.edu/academic.depts/soc/run.html*http//indigo.ie/obrienh/bean.htm*htt p//www.american.edu/academic.depts/soc/kid.html*http//www.wikipedia.org/wiki/1921_in_film*http//wso.williams.edu/dgerstei/chaplin/charlie-the-kid.html*http//math.gc.cuny.edu/Charlie_Chaplin_bio.html*http//www.gltech.org/Death%20of%20a%20Salesman/Dramatic%20Terms.htm*http//www.tvguide.com/movies/database/ShowMovie.asp?MI=38984*http//www.moviesunlimited.com/musite/product.asp?sku=043041*http//www.wikipedia.org/wiki/Silent_film*http//guweb2.gonzaga.edu/faculty/wheeler/lit_terms_Q-Z.htmllit.terms.S.Anchor*http//www.epinions.com/content_29557624452*http//www.historychannel.com/cgi-bin/frameit.cgi?p=http%3A//www.historychann